我的第一个选择可能看起来很奇怪,因为它不是英伟达所告知内容的直接受益者。两个中的一个是,但我要谈的第一个是Meta。
Yeah. So my first one is might seem very strange because it's not a direct beneficiary of what Nvidia has told us. One of the two is but the first one I'll talk about is Meta.
Meta当然在英伟达芯片上花费了巨额资金,但它也在自研定制芯片上花费了巨额资金。但这里的联系是关于成本,而不是收入。
Now Meta of course spends an insane amount of money on Nvidia chips but it also spends an insane amount of money on making its own custom chips. But the connection here is about cost and not revenue.
当英伟达表示其新的Vera Rubin芯片每兆瓦吞吐量提升30倍,每token成本比上一代降低35%时,如果这是真的,且Meta能以更低的成本获得相同的人工智能工作负载,那么Meta的核心业务当然会看起来好得多。
So when Nvidia said that its new Vera Rubin chip delivers 30 times more throughput per megawatt and 35 times lower cost per token than its prior generation. Well, if that is true and Meta can get the same AI workloads for less money, of course, Meta's business, Meta's core business is going to look much much better.